Publication ethics, open access, copyright, plagiarism, and privacy policies that guide transparent scholarly publishing at MJEST.
Policy Library
Use these documents to understand author rights, editorial ethics, similarity screening, open access, and data handling.
Authors retain scholarly rights while granting MJEST permission to publish and distribute the accepted work.
1. Policy Statement The NFC Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology (MJEST) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality, integrity, and transparency. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure their suitability for publication. 2. Double-Blind Peer Review The journal follows a double-blind review policy, whereby: The identity of the authors is concealed from the reviewers The identity of the reviewers is concealed from the authors This ensures an objective, unbiased, and independent evaluation process, minimizing any potential conflict of interest. 3. Review Process 3.1 Initial Screening (Desk Review) All submitted manuscripts are initially screened by the Chief Editor and/or Editorial Board to assess: Relevance to the journal’s scope Originality and quality of research Plagiarism (maximum similarity index: 19%) Compliance with submission guidelines Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected at this stage. 3.2 Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are forwarded to at least two independent reviewers with relevant subject expertise. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on: Originality and contribution to knowledge Methodological rigor Clarity and organization Relevance of literature and references Based on reviewers’ feedback, the manuscript may be: Accepted Accepted with minor revisions Returned for major revisions Rejected 3.3 Revision Process Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in light of reviewers’ comments within the specified time. Revised manuscripts may be subject to further review if necessary. 3.4 Copy Editing and Proofreading Accepted manuscripts undergo professional copy editing and proofreading to ensure accuracy, clarity, and consistency in formatting and language. 3.5 Final Decision The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editorial Board, based on reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the manuscript. 4. Duration of Review Process The journal aims to complete the review and publication process within the following timeframes: Initial Screening: 2–3 weeks Peer Review: 4–6 weeks Revision by Authors: 2–3 weeks The total review process is typically completed within 8–12 weeks. 5. Editorial Responsibility The Editorial Board is responsible for: Managing the peer review process Selecting qualified reviewers Ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of the review process Editorial Board members do not act as reviewers for assigned manuscripts unless required. 6. Conflict of Interest Policy To maintain transparency and impartiality: Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest Manuscripts submitted by Editorial Board members are handled by independent editors Any involvement that may influence objectivity must be declared 7. Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers Reviewers are expected to adhere to the following principles: Review manuscripts only within their area of expertise Maintain strict confidentiality of all submitted materials Avoid using unpublished information for personal or professional gain Provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback Avoid discrimination based on nationality, gender, religion, or institutional affiliation Refrain from making personal or derogatory comments 8. Compliance with Ethical Standards The journal adheres to the ethical guidelines and best practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure integrity in scholarly publishing.
MJEST provides immediate open access to published research so readers can view and download articles without login.
The Multidisciplinary Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology (MJEST) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality, integrity, and transparency. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure their suitability for publication.
The journal follows a double-blind review policy, whereby:
This ensures an objective, unbiased, and independent evaluation process, minimizing any potential conflict of interest.
All submitted manuscripts are initially screened by the Chief Editor and/or Editorial Board to assess:
Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected at this stage.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are forwarded to at least two independent reviewers with relevant subject expertise. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:
Based on reviewers’ feedback, the manuscript may be:
Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in light of reviewers’ comments within the specified time. Revised manuscripts may be subject to further review if necessary.
Accepted manuscripts undergo professional copy editing and proofreading to ensure accuracy, clarity, and consistency in formatting and language.
The final decision regarding publication is made by the Editorial Board, based on reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the manuscript.
The journal aims to complete the review and publication process within the following timeframes:
Initial Screening 2–3 Weeks
Peer Review 4–6 Weeks
Revision by Authors 2–3 Weeks
The total review process is typically completed within 8–12 weeks.
The Editorial Board is responsible for:
Editorial Board members do not act as reviewers for assigned manuscripts unless required.
To maintain transparency and impartiality:
Reviewers are expected to adhere to the following principles:
The journal adheres to the ethical guidelines and best practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure integrity in scholarly publishing.